What we explored
The central gap in Human Capital .+ was not the AI itself but the bridge from verified productivity to actual returned human time. That led to the Time+ Agreement and a clearer shared-productivity model.
We then explored the relationship to Universal Basic Income, which became the first developed Perspective rather than a Core claim. The broader documentation structure also grew quickly enough that we had to simplify it again.
What changed
- Time+ became an explicit economic mechanism rather than an aspiration.
- Perspectives became living arguments rather than FAQ-like topic pages.
- FAQ became the place for straightforward reader questions.
- History gained Behind the scenes as a lightweight development notebook.
- Core versioning settled on major.minor only.
What remains unresolved
Portability boundaryHow much professional capability can travel without carrying protected employer knowledge.
Economic evidenceWhether saved human minutes become real employer and worker value in practice.
DurabilityHow Time+ survives organizational change without becoming rigid when the role genuinely changes.
Likely next thread
Less structure, more contact with reality: continue testing ownership, portability, Participant Zero and Time+ economics, and let Perspectives grow only when they reveal something worth exploring.
No new Core change proposed by this note.